Correct the mistakes: 1. Criminal law presupposes a rule of law in defined acts as criminal.

2. Intellectual property laws reward the creators of original works by prevent others from to copy their works. 3. They stopped to involve the lawyer to defend the offender. 4. That's not worth to involve children into the trial stage. 5. He is accused of committing a robbery. 6. We didn't make him to determine if there was a criminal intent. 7. If the offender turns out to being a policeman, we'll qualify the offence as omission. 8. Acts committing during fits of epilepsy are involuntary.

Question

Английский язык

Айвек

26 июня, 18:31

Correct the mistakes: 1. Criminal law presupposes a rule of law in defined acts as criminal.

2. Intellectual property laws reward the creators of original works by prevent others from to copy their works. 3. They stopped to involve the lawyer to defend the offender. 4. That's not worth to involve children into the trial stage. 5. He is accused of committing a robbery. 6. We didn't make him to determine if there was a criminal intent. 7. If the offender turns out to being a policeman, we'll qualify the offence as omission. 8. Acts committing during fits of epilepsy are involuntary.

+3

Ответы (1)

Знаете ответ на вопрос?

Мелвин · Answer 1

1. Criminal law presupposes a rule of law in defining acts as criminal.

2. Intellectual property laws reward the creators of original works by preventing others from copying their works.

3. They stopped involving the lawyer to defend the offender.

4. That's not worth involving children into the trial stage.

5. He is accused of committing robbery.

6. We didn't make him determine if there was a criminal intent.

7. If the offender turns out to be a policeman, we'll qualify the offence as omission.

8. Acts committed during fits of epilepsy are involuntary.